ࡱ>  (ɀ\pRebecca Esselman Ba= ThisWorkbook=xxL;"8X@"1Arial1Arial1Arial1Arial1Arial1QTahoma1QTahoma1QTahoma1Arial1Arial1Arial1Arial1Arial"$"#,##0_);\("$"#,##0\)!"$"#,##0_);[Red]\("$"#,##0\)""$"#,##0.00_);\("$"#,##0.00\)'""$"#,##0.00_);[Red]\("$"#,##0.00\)7*2_("$"* #,##0_);_("$"* \(#,##0\);_("$"* "-"_);_(@_).))_(* #,##0_);_(* \(#,##0\);_(* "-"_);_(@_)?,:_("$"* #,##0.00_);_("$"* \(#,##0.00\);_("$"* "-"??_);_(@_)6+1_(* #,##0.00_);_(* \(#,##0.00\);_(* "-"??_);_(@_)                + ) , *     0@ @ 8@ @ 0   @ p@ @  p@ @  8   ("@@  "@  " @  ` p@ @ p  h"@@  h"@  h " @  ("@   ( 0@ 0 0  (@@  @   @  (@   @ 8  @ 0!@ @ 0!!@ @ 8@ @ x@ @  8@  x@  x@  ( " @ 0 0@ @ 0@ @ 0!@ @ 0!@ @ (0@ @ 8@ @ 8@@ 0@ 0  @ 0@ 0 0@ 0 0  8@ 8@@ 0@ 0  @ 0 @ 0 0 0@@ 0@ 0  @  8@@ 0@ 0@  x  X `P( Instructions8Stakeholder Summary$rStakeholder-threat relationsTbZ   3  @@  cPAIQSummary on social and institutional stakeholders relevant to conservation efforts Site Name:Planning team:Assessment or update date: StakeholderStakeholders interest:METHODOLOGY TO RANK SOCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL STAKEHOLDERS LCEDEC = Centro Empresarial para el Desarrollo y la Capacitacin (in Mexico).2First one makes a list of all social and institutional stakeholders that have an influence (positive and negative) on all key threats and on each conservation target. A consolidated list is generated from this "brainstorming session", since several stkeholders can appear for multiple threats and targets. General Instructions:The information can be sorted by: influence, attitude, target, or threat to help teams identify critical stakeholders for diverse purposes.In the "stakeholder-threat relations" worksheet instructions are included in each cell. These can be viewed by positioning the cursor on the column title where a small red marker appears. Definition of terms: Stakeholder's Interest: This refers to the specific interests of identified stakeholders, for example, cattle ranchers are interested in increasing the profitability of their production systems to increase their income. In the case of institutional stakeholders the interest refers to the institution's mandate or mission, for example, a conservation NGO could have the mission to  Protect tropical forests in Mesoamerica . JustificationJustification: This refers to the reasons that motivated the planning team to include this stakeholder, which could provide more specific information on the stakeholders contribution or interference with conservation efforts.  6Stakeholder totally in favor of conservation project. ?Stakeholder indifferent in regards to the conservation project.:Stakeholder moderately against the conservation project. 6Stakeholder totally against the conservation project. Attitude: Ranking3Stakeholder is very influential in decision-making.-Stakeholder is influential in decision-making Influence level: 3 = 2 = 1 = 7Stakeholder is slightly influential in decision-making ChPlanning team is certain of the values assigned to stakeholder, based on clear and precise information. =Stakeholder moderately in favor of the conservation project. |Planning team is not completely certain of the values assigned to stakeholder, rankings are based on incomplete information.~Planning team has no information on the stakeholder, and assigned values are based on a shared perception of the stakeholder. Level of certainty: Values assigned for ranking stakeholders according to their attitude towards conservation efforts, their level of influence and the level of certainty of information. {Level of certainty: This is a control measure about the information stated in previous cells, which evaluates its quality.  Influence level: This refers to the specific weight of the stakeholder in important decision-making arenas which relate in any way to the success or failure of the conservation project proposed by the planning team. Attitude: This refers to the posture that the specific stakeholder takes or would take in regards to the conservation project that the team intends to implement. Engagement strategyEngagement strategy: In this area teams can describe the approach or strategy that will be taken to strengthen alliances or synergies with specific stakeholders or to seek greater involvement or attitude changes, according to specific needs.  Assessment of Social and Institutional Stakeholders relevant for Conservation in relation to conservation targets and critical threats. 4Assessment of Stakeholders relevant for ConservationJConservation targets on which the stakeholder has some degree of influenceRThreats (sources of stress) on which the stakeholder has some degree of influence.Target 1Target 2Target 3Target 4Target 5Target 6Target 7Target 82Current status of ecological integrity (viability)Threat 1Threat 2Threat 3Threat 4Threat 5Threat 6Threat 7Threat 8Threat 9 Threat 10 Threat 11 Threat 12Global threat rank for threat 1Global threat rank for threat 2Global threat rank for threat 3Global threat rank for threat 4Global threat rank for threat 5Global threat rank for threat 6Global threat rank for threat 7Global threat rank for threat 8Global threat rank for threat 9 Global threat rank for threat 10 Global threat rank for threat 11 Global threat rank for threat 12"The methodology was adapted by Nature Conservancy staff for a conservation planning exercise at the Chiapas Coastal Watersheds Platform Site in Southern Mexico, from the "Stakeholder Analysis - Methodology for Strategic Planning and Project Administration from the "Project Cycle of CEDEC".NOTE: The "0" values which appear on this worksheet refer to information which is linked to the other worksheet on which teams should fill in information on stakeholders and their relation to conservation targets and threats. Please fill in stakeholder-threat information first. In the worksheet included in this workbook under "stakeholder-threat relations" one collects information about the interest of each stakeholder, documenting the reasons that justify the identifed interest. On this sheet one incorporates information on conservation targets and critical threats for the site (which can be taken from the Nature Conservancy's 5S planning tool), marking those to which the stakeholder is related. On the same worksheet values are determined for each stakeholder, considering attitude towards conservation efforts, level of influence and level of certainty for the information. A strategy or "approach" can be defined to maintain a stakeholder's interest in conservation, or to achieve greater support for conservation. However, the planning team may decide not to complete the strategies section at this point, and rather wait until the conservation strategies which are defined in the conservation plan identify specific stakeholders, to incorporate the information from this stakeholder analysis. R 8^Ag 2X %K ' ! (ɀ :6*0X7  dMbP?_*+% MHP DeskJet@f,,@MSUDHP DeskJetd"TXX??U} } }  } m:     @ v@ @  @    @    @  @  v@ @                  RMSSSSSSSTF<<<<<<<G O PPPPPPP, - ......./01 U UUUUUUUU UUUUUUUUU UUUUUUUUU *+ FO UUUUUUUG FUUUUUUUGFUUUUUUUG*+ F UUUUUUUG O PPPPPPPQ -......./ CDDDDDDDEF<<<<<<<GF<<<<<<<GHIIIIIIIJ*+ CDDDDDDDEHIIIIIIIJ*+ C%DDDDDDDEHIIIIIIIJ21 K$<<<<<<<GDJl((((((((((( ! " # $ %  &  ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9   HIIIIIIIJ!21 "L#"MMMMMMMN#21 $C'$DDDDDDDE%OPPPPPPPQ 'V"'SSSSSSST(FUUUUUUUG)21 *L*MMMMMM *3 +W+XXXXXXX~ +4@ ,=,>>>>>>>~ ,4? -=->>>>>>>~ -4 .=.>>>>>>>~ .4 /=/>>>>>>A~ /4021 1B1>>>>>>> 13 2=2>>>>>>>~ 24@ 3=3>>>>>>>~ 34@ 4=4>>>>>>>~ 44?521 6B!6>>>>>>> 63 7=7>>>>>>>~ 74@ 8=8>>>>>>>~ 84@ 9? 9@@@@@@@~ 95?88(((4444444444444>!@<d  --  '(++,, ""$%**8899..//1122774466337 Sheet1 (ɀ yh;(Q:msx~`(Hجh0Pp8X  x @&,17`=(CHNTHZ^  dMbP?_*+%&RQ?'?(RQ?)p= ף?MHP LaserJet 6P@g XX@MSUDHP LaserJet 6Pd "`XX??U} } I} '} } $} m} ,}  Actory;;;;;@      ) ) ) )) YNZZZZZZZZZZZZZ   6 6 6 6 6& DhZ  Z   Z   Z   Z   Z    Z   Z   Z   Z   Z   Z    Z   Z   Z   Z   Z   Z   Z  Z  Z  Z  Z  Z  ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ Z Z Z Z Z Z@D $b !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>? !Z  !Z  !Z  !Z  !Z  !Z  !"Z!!"Z!!"Z!!"Z!!"Z!!"Z!!"#Z""#Z""#Z""#Z""#Z""#Z""#$Z##$Z##$Z##$Z##$Z##$Z##$%Z$$%Z$$%Z$$%Z$$%Z$$%Z$$%&Z%%&Z%%&Z%%&Z%%&Z%%&Z%%&'Z&&'Z&&'Z&&'Z&&'Z&&'Z&&'(Z''(Z''(Z''(Z''(Z''(Z''()Z(()Z(()Z(()Z(()Z(()Z(()*Z))*Z))*Z))*Z))*Z))*Z))*+Z**+Z**+Z**+Z**+Z**+Z**+,Z++,Z++,Z++,Z++,Z++,Z++,-Z,,-Z,,-Z,,-Z,,-Z,,-Z,,-.Z--.Z--.Z--.Z--.Z--.Z--./Z../Z../Z../Z../Z../Z../0Z//0Z//0Z//0Z//0Z//0Z//01Z001Z001Z001Z001Z001Z0012Z112Z112Z112Z112Z112Z1123Z223Z223Z223Z223Z223Z2234Z334Z334Z334Z334Z334Z3345Z445Z445Z445Z445Z445Z4456Z556Z556Z556Z556Z556Z5567Z667Z667Z667Z667Z667Z6678Z778Z778Z778Z778Z778Z7789Z889Z889Z889Z889Z889Z889:Z99:Z99:Z99:Z99:Z99:Z99:;Z::;Z::;Z::;Z::;Z::;Z::;<Z;;<Z;;<Z;;<Z;;<Z;;<Z;;<=Z<<=Z<<=Z<<=Z<<=Z<<=Z<<=>Z==>Z==>Z==>Z==>Z==>Z==> Z>> Z>> Z>> Z>> Z>> Z>>??Dl@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_@@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_Dl`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~DlDlDlDlDl          Dl !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>? !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?Dl@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_Dl`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~DlDlDlDlDl          Dl !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>? !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?Dl@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_Dl`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~DlDlDlDlDl          Dl !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>? !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?Dl@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_Dl`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~DlDlDlDlDl          Dl !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>? !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?Dl@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_Dl`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~DlDlDlDlDl          Dl !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>? !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?Dl@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_Dl`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwx`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwx6L (  ~  <I_ XPP?  ]4@I_l B/ hpL9 <Justification: This refers to the reasons that motivated the planning team to include this stakeholder, which could provide more specific information on the stakeholders contribution or interference with conservation efforts. <E ~~  <I_ XPP? ?K]4@I_h C/ hpL9 p<Attitude: This refers to the posture that the specific stakeholder takes or would take in regards to the conservation project that the team intends to implement. 2 = stakeholder totally in favor of conservation project. 1 = moderately in favor of the conservation project. 0 = stakeholder indifferent in regards to the conservation project. -1 = stakeholder moderately against the conservation project. -2 = stakeholder totally against the conservation project. <p/ *W X\( ~~  <TJ_ XPP? t' ]4@TJ_d D/ hpL9 OP<PInfluence level: This refers to the specific weight of the stakeholder in important decision-making arenas which relate in any way to the success or failure of the conservation project proposed by the planning team. 3 = very influential in decision-making 2 = influential in decision-making 1 = slightly influential in decision-making <PS #&Om~~  <J_ XPP? ?]4@J_`  E/ hpL9 H<Level of certainty: This is a control measure about the information stated in previous cells, which evaluates its quality. 3 = planning team is certain of the values assigned to stakeholder, based on clear and precise information. 2 = planning team is not completely certain of the values assigned to stakeholder, rankings are based on incomplete information. 1 = planning team has no information on the stakeholder, and assigned values are based on a shared perception of the stakeholder. <Hf|cjnv~~  <K_ XPP? H P ]4@K_\  F/ hpL9  <Engagement strategy: In this area teams can describe the approach or strategy that will be taken to strengthen alliances or synergies with specific stakeholders or to seek greater involvement or attitude changes, according to specific needs. < $m~~   <K_ XPP? x7 ]4 @K_X  @/ hpL9 <Stakeholder name <a\ca~~   <K_ XPP? 7]]4 @K_T  A/ hpL9 <SStakeholder's interest: This refers to the specific interests of identified stakeholders, for example, cattle ranchers are interested in increasing the profitability of their production systems to increase their income. In the case of institutional stakeholders the interest refers to the institution's mandate or mission, for example, a conservation NGO could have the mission to  Protect tropical forests in Mesoamerica . <Ys]" Cristina Lasch Thalert"  Cristina Lasch Thalert" Cristina Lasch Thalert" Cristina Lasch Thalert" Cristina Lasch Thalert" Cristina Lasch Thalert" Cristina Lasch Thalert>@<d 7 Sheet2 (ɀ  tt  dMbP?_*+%MHP DeskJet@fXX@MSUDHP DeskJetd"/XX??U} $} I} I} } I} m}  } $} "} } } $ 'AmenazaObjeto de conservacinIt;;;;;;        )() ) ) )) )((((; * ! %+&&&&&&&&&&'   6 6 6 67 8, 8-  8.  8/  80  81  82 839 :5 :6 :7 :8 :9 :: :; :< := :> :? :@ 6&  4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4  #A #B #C #D #E #F #G #H #I #J #K #L @ ############@ ############@ ############@ ############@############@############@############@############@############@############@############@############@############@############@############@############@############@############@############@############@############@############D l  vDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ ############@!############@"############B#############@$############@%############@&############ ':'############@(############@)############B*############B+############B,############B-############B.############B/############B0############B1############B2############B3############B4############B5############B6############B7############B8############B9############B:############B;############B<############B=############B>$$$$$$$$$$$$B?$$$$$$$$$$$$D6 lDDDFDDDLDDFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_B@$$$$$$$$$$$$BA$$$$$$$$$$$$BB$$$$$$$$$$$$BC$$$$$$$$$$$$BD$$$$$$$$$$$$BE$$$$$$$$$$$$BF$$$$$$$$$$$$BG$$$$$$$$$$$$BH$$$$$$$$$$$$BI$$$$$$$$$$$$BJ$$$$$$$$$$$$BK$$$$$$$$$$$$BL$$$$$$$$$$$$BM$$$$$$$$$$$$BN$$$$$$$$$$$$BO$$$$$$$$$$$$BP$$$$$$$$$$$$BQ$$$$$$$$$$$$BR$$$$$$$$$$$$BS$$$$$$$$$$$$BT$$$$$$$$$$$$BU$$$$$$$$$$$$BV$$$$$$$$$$$$BW$$$$$$$$$$$$BX$$$$$$$$$$$$BY$$$$$$$$$$$$BZ$$$$$$$$$$$$B[$$$$$$$$$$$$B\$$$$$$$$$$$$B]$$$$$$$$$$$$B^$$$$$$$$$$$$B_$$$$$$$$$$$$D@ lFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF`abcdefghijklmnopqrsB`$$$$$$$$$$$$Ba$$$$$$$$$$$$Bb$$$$$$$$$$$$Bc$$$$$$$$$$$$Bd$$$$$$$$$$$$Be$$$$$$$$$$$$Bf$$$$$$$$$$$$Bg$$$$$$$$$$$$Bh$$$$$$$$$$$$Bi$$$$$$$$$$$$Bj$$$$$$$$$$$$Bk$$$$$$$$$$$$Bl$$$$$$$$$$$$Bm$$$$$$$$$$$$Bn$$$$$$$$$$$$Bo$$$$$$$$$$$$Bp$$$$$$$$$$$$Bq$$$$$$$$$$$$Br$$$$$$$$$$$$Bs$$$$$$$$$$$$,|FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF  ( f ~  < _ XPP? g=]4@ _ ƎgpMK9 /<0Add the names of priority threats from the 5S workbook, with their respective global values in each cell under the corresponding threat. Add more columns if the site has more threats. Mark each threat on which the stakeholder has some degree of influence, considering positive and negative influence. </UD~~  <X!_ XPP? z I\]4@X!_| ƎgpMK9 <Add the name of each conservation target and its general current ecological health or viability rank (from the 5S workbook). Mark each target on which the stakeholder has some degree of influence, which can be positive or negative. <v~~  <!_ XPP? xr^@]4@!_x ƎgpMK9 <Stakeholder name <a\ca~~  < "_ XPP? ^r ]4@ "_t ƎgpMK9 <SStakeholder's interest: This refers to the specific interests of identified stakeholders, for example, cattle ranchers are interested in increasing the profitability of their production systems to increase their income. In the case of institutional stakeholders the interest refers to the institution's mandate or mission, for example, a conservation NGO could have the mission to  Protect tropical forests in Mesoamerica . <Ys]~~  <"_ XPP? wr~ ]4@"_p ƎgpMK9 <Justification: This refers to the reasons that motivated the planning team to include this stakeholder, which could provide more specific information on the stakeholders contribution or interference with conservation efforts. <E ~~  <"_ XPP? wr9 -]4@"_l ƎgpMK9 p<Attitude: This refers to the posture that the specific stakeholder takes or would take in regards to the conservation project that the team intends to implement. 2 = stakeholder totally in favor of conservation project. 1 = moderately in favor of the conservation project. 0 = stakeholder indifferent in regards to the conservation project. -1 = stakeholder moderately against the conservation project. -2 = stakeholder totally against the conservation project. <p/ *W X\( ~~  <(`_ XPP? ]r L 0]4@(`_h ƎgpMK9 OP<PInfluence level: This refers to the specific weight of the stakeholder in important decision-making arenas which relate in any way to the success or failure of the conservation project proposed by the planning team. 3 = very influential in decision-making 2 = influential in decision-making 1 = slightly influential in decision-making <PS #&Om~~  <`_ XPP? r  ]4@`_d ƎgpMK9 H<Level of certainty: This is a control measure about the information stated in previous cells, which evaluates its quality. 3 = planning team is certain of the values assigned to stakeholder, based on clear and precise information. 2 = planning team is not completely certain of the values assigned to stakeholder, rankings are based on incomplete information. 1 = planning team has no information on the stakeholder, and assigned values are based on a shared perception of the stakeholder. <Hf|cjnv~~  <`_ XPP? _r"@x]4@`_` ƎgpMK9  <Engagement strategy: In this area teams can describe the approach or strategy that will be taken to strengthen alliances or synergies with specific stakeholders or to seek greater involvement or attitude changes, according to specific needs. < $m"Cristina Lasch Thalera"Cristina Lasch Thalera"Cristina Lasch Thalera"Cristina Lasch Thalera"Cristina Lasch Thalera"Cristina Lasch Thalera"Cristina Lasch Thalera"Cristina Lasch Thalera"Cristina Lasch Thalera>@<d  7 Sheet3 Oh+'0HPp Cristina Lasch Thaler WOCAT DIRLaMicrosoft Excel@K޾@j@|.՜.+,0 PXx  The Nature Conservancy  InstructionsStakeholder SummaryStakeholder-threat relations  Worksheets  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~Root Entry Fl9WorkbookSummaryInformation(DocumentSummaryInformation8