Reflections on Hurricane Irene
Retreat To High Ground
Hurricane Danger What if Irene had been a major hurricane?
Hartford Courant, August 30, 2011
In boxing terms, Hurricane Irene was a welterweight, compared to a heavyweight such as the Great 1938 Hurricane. Indeed, Irene was a tropical storm by the time it reached most of Connecticut, yet it still wreaked havoc with property along the shore. Dozens of homes were damaged or destroyed in East Haven alone, some collapsing into the roaring surf.
What if this had been a Category III storm, with 125-140 mph winds and a surge of more than 25 feet, as in 1938? There would have been catastrophic destruction. That it didn't happen doesn't mean it couldn't have. It could have, and most likely — almost certainly — will.
So what is Connecticut going to do to prepare for this likely cataclysm? Probably nothing, just rebuild what was there. Thanks to meek local zoning and the seemingly bottomless National Flood Insurance Program, most owners will hum "Good Night, Irene" and put those houses or cottages back up.
Narrative from Hartford Courant - Full editorial here:
http://www.courant.com/news/opinion/editorials/hc-ed-irene-aftermath-20110830,0,5109545.story
Don't Rebuild
Miles of cottages and homes were built cheek-by-jowl along Connecticut's beachfront before there was a full appreciation of hurricane danger. But thanks largely to the beneficence of Uncle Sam, when these houses get knocked down, they are often rebuilt.
The problem is that the federal flood insurance program, which was supposed to be self-sustaining when created in 1968, is reportedly $18 billion in debt, much of it from Hurricane Katrina. Taxpayers cannot keep pouring money into houses in high-risk areas. One and done.
Second, as a matter of safety and good land use, houses shouldn't be built in highly flood-prone areas. Many of these areas should be cleared and maintained as buffers for land further away from the coast (one of the many reasons to preserve salt marshes). In addition, houses that are being smashed up by a storm become a danger to other properties.
Also, some houses that weren't in danger in years past are now or soon will be, because the sea level is rising. Whatever you might think is the cause, sea level is rising faster along the U.S. East Coast than it has for 2,000 years due to rising temperatures, going from 2.1 millimeters a year a century ago to an annual 3.2 millimeters today, according to a study reported in June in Scientific American. Many scientists think the rise in sea level is causing more violent storms.
.... full article available at link above.
Related Op Ed from CT Post:
-
Posted by Anne Wallach Thomas on Monday, September 12, 201111:37PM
Opinions expressed on any workspace blog in ConserveOnline and in any corresponding comments are the personal opinions of the original authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Nature Conservancy.
Terms of UseLast updated: June 16, 2009
Please read these legal terms carefully before using this blog.
We’re delighted that you’re considering posting a comment on a workspace blog in ConserveOnline. Here are some things you should know and guidelines we need you to follow as you craft your comment:
- We welcome and encourage vigorous debate in the comment section of its blog. We will not discriminate against comments that express views different from the official stated position of the organization or of its individual bloggers simply on the basis of that difference.
- However, all comments submitted to this blog are moderated, which means that they will be reviewed by Conservancy staff and/or workspace owners prior to their publication on the blog. We have final edit and approval of any comment submitted to the blog for publication.
- We reserve the right to reject a comment for publication if we feel the comment violates our guidelines or is otherwise inappropriate for the blog. We also reserve the right to edit comments for style, length or other considerations.
- Comments containing obvious factual inaccuracies, unattributed facts and quotes, insulting comments, or libelous/unlawful statements will not be published. While vigorous debate is welcome, all remarks should generally be directed at issues, positions, events, and statements, rather than at individuals.
- We will not publish comments that it deems to be abusive, defamatory, embarrassing, harassing, hateful, obscene, profane, or threatening to another person or entity, including the Conservancy.
- In addition, we reserve the right to not publish blog comments that it deems for any other reason to be unsuitable, unlawful, or objectionable, such as but not limited to the content of the posting/material (for example, the usage of inappropriate language), the subject matter, the timeliness or relevance of the material/posting, or reasons related to intellectual property, among others. We may employ technical tools to identify postings that may contain objectionable material.
- Comments that link to web pages that violate any of the above guidelines will not be published.
- By submitting a comment to the this blog, you are granting us a royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable, non-exclusive right and license to use, reproduce, modify, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, transmit, perform, and display the comment (in whole or in part) worldwide and/or to incorporate into other works in any form, media, or technology now known or later developed for the full term of any rights that may exist in such content or information. You also acknowledge that such submissions are non-confidential for all purposes.
All questions or comments should be addressed to conserveonline@tnc.org

