ࡱ> 9;678U@ bjbj ,\hhhhhhh|lll8mml|{h8pNp"ppppppKqKqKq$R5ZhKqKqhhpppp"hpphpp*hhZpp,p PylFr?<{حJ4Z||hhhhZhnxKqIzl$مKqKqKq||d;@,||@ State Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Support Program Application for Funds Applications must be received no later than May 15, 2006 Incomplete applications will not be considered. I. APPLICANT INFORMATION Organization (intended recipient): Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries Street: 4010 W. Broad St. City, State, Zip: Richmond, VA 23230 Home Page: http://www.dgif.virginia.gov/ Congressional District: All districts in Virginia (VA 1 11) Latitude/Longitude: 37 34 21N 77 7becca K. WajdaEAFWA - regional nland Fisheries 28 54W Organization Type: State Agency (on behalf of NEAFWA - regional assoc.) (state agency or regional association) Project Officer: Rebecca K. Wajda Financial Officer: Raymond Davis Telephone: 804-367-8351 Telephone: 804-367-2387 Fax: 804-367-0262 Fax: 804-367-0405 E-mail: becky.wajda@dgif.virginia.gov E-mail: ray.davis@dgif.virginia.gov Tax Status: Exempt (state agency) Tax ID#: 54-6001721 Fiscal Year End (MM/DD): 06/30 (as assigned by IRS) II. PROJECT INFORMATION Project Name: Regional Habitat Maps - A Foundation For Proactive Conservation Projects Location(s) of Project: State(s): Maine, Massachusetts, Vermont, New Hampshire, New York, Connecticut, New Jersey, Rhode Island, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Delaware, District of Columbia, West Virginia, Virginia Country: United States of America U.S. Congressional District(s): all districts in 14 states/territories above Dates: Project Start Date: 1 August 2006 Project End Date: 1 February 2008 Application Submission Date: 17 May 2006 Cooperating Organizations Receiving funds from this grant? (Y or N) (state agencies, federal agencies, non-governmental organizations) Northeast Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies N Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife N Massachusetts Division of Fish and Wildlife N Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department N New Hampshire Fish and Game Department N New York Dept. of Environmental Conservation N Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection N New Jersey Division of Wildlife N Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management N Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission N Pennsylvania Game Commission N Maryland Department of Natural Resources N Delaware Division of Fish and Wildlife N District of Columbia Fisheries and Wildlife N West Virginia Division of Natural Resources N Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries Y U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service N III. GRANT REQUEST NFWF FUNDS REQUESTED: $ 98,300 (in U.S. dollars, rounded to the nearest hundred) MATCHING CONTRIBUTIONS Amount to be contributed to match NFWF Funds (if any please include any in-kind match provided by applicant, cooperating state or federal agencies, or partner non-governmental organizations): $49,700 Source Type (staff time, overhead, Amount: supplies, cash) Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife staff time/travel $3,106 Massachusetts Division of Fish and Wildlife staff time/travel $3,106 Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department staff time/travel $3,106 New Hampshire Fish and Game Department staff time/travel $3,106 New York Dept. of Environmental Conservation staff time/travel $3,106 Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection staff time/travel $3,106 New Jersey Division of Wildlife staff time/travel $3,106 Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management staff time/travel $3,106 Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission staff time/travel $3,106 Pennsylvania Game Commission staff time/travel $3,106 Maryland Department of Natural Resources staff time/travel $3,106 Delaware Division of Fish and Wildlife staff time/travel $3,106 District of Columbia Fisheries and Wildlife staff time/travel $3,106 West Virginia Division of Natural Resources staff time/travel $3,106 Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries staff time/travel $3,106 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service staff time/travel $3,106 TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET (NFWF + MATCH): $ 148,000 IV. PROPOSAL NARRATIVE I. Project Abstract A.) Project Description With the creation of State Wildlife Action Plans (SWAP), the need for consistent, current digital habitat maps has grown dramatically. The implementation of the SWAPs within each state and across the Northeast region will be greatly enhanced through the development of current, consistent terrestrial and aquatic habitat geographic information systems (GIS) datasets. This project will compile and standardize terrestrial and aquatic habitat classification systems and provide map products that will form the foundation of state and regional conservation in the Northeastern United States. B.) Final Products Northeastern Terrestrial Habitat Classification System (NETHCS), a standardized terrestrial wildlife habitat classification system for the Northeast An action plan to create a detailed terrestrial habitat GIS dataset in partnerships with national programs Northeastern Aquatic Habitat Classification System (NEAHCS), a standardized aquatic habitat classification system GIS dataset of aquatic habitat using the standardized aquatic habitat classification system Standardized map of protected areas for the Northeastern U.S. Documentation of each states wildlife habitat mapping resources, including classification systems, spatial datasets, processes, and GIS resources A standing Northeast Regional habitat mapping coordinating committee II. Project Proposal A.) Project Need Development of consistent regional habitat classification systems, land cover map, aquatic habitat map, and related products was considered the most important regional initiative of more than 70 conceptual project topics reviewed at a meeting of Northeast states biologists and administrators held March 28th-30 th 2006 in Albany, NY. The Northeast Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies (NEAFWA) received funding to conduct this workshop through a National Fish and Wildlife Foundation (NFWF)/Doris Duke Charitable Foundation grant in order to review, create, and prioritize Northeast regional conservation actions identified through the SWAPs. The project outlined here was overwhelmingly supported as the most critical regional initiative because the results will form the foundation for collaboration of habitat-based conservation efforts. Many other important projects discussed at this meeting will benefit from the products created through this effort. Nearly all conservation planning for fish and wildlife populations and landscapes would be virtually impossible without a reasonably detailed assessment of habitat, ideally accomplished through digital mapping. The need for habitat maps has been recognized by all Northeastern states, through the development of State Wildlife Action Plans (SWAPs). These Action Plans provide the foundation for the conservation of the most imperiled species in each state. In many states, particularly Massachusetts, New Jersey, Virginia and New Hampshire, state-level mapping products were integral to the development of their SWAPs and the implementation of habitat conservation. However, each state completed these maps with different objectives, scopes, and classification systems. Some jurisdictions did not have access to habitat maps, and therefore lack this critical conservation tool. Implementation of conservation actions outlined in the SWAPs, both regionally and within each state, will be greatly promoted by the development of current, consistent terrestrial and aquatic habitat geographic information systems (GIS) datasets. Regional habitat maps will allow each state to assess habitat conditions at jurisdictional borders, such as large habitat patches and watersheds that cover multiple jurisdictions, thereby furthering the understanding of species and the status their habitats. These maps will also serve as a consistent base for delineating more detailed habitat categories. These GIS datasets will facilitate interstate coordination by providing a common foundation of habitat location and status, as well as improving the success of state-level actions by assisting jurisdictions that have not yet developed such tools. Most importantly, regional maps will: create a new opportunity to assess habitats at a scale broader than the individual state; facilitate a new understanding of habitats and populations on a regional scale; allow for prioritization of habitat conservation actions across the region; facilitate more effective and efficient habitat conservation. B.) Objectives Foster regional cooperative wildlife conservation by adopting regional terrestrial and aquatic habitat classification systems. Advance partnership with regional and national initiatives to promote detailed regional fish and wildlife habitat classification and mapping, including the National Fish Habitat Initiative, LANDFIRE, and the National Gap Analysis Program. Provide seamless regional aquatic and terrestrial habitat spatial datasets. An aquatic habitat dataset will be created and distributed. The latest U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) land cover dataset will be promoted as a base-layer for terrestrial habitat. These datasets will be basic in detail but will provide the basis for more detailed classification determined in Objective 1. Assess each partner states habitat quantification capabilities, including habitat classification systems, spatial data, and geographic information system (GIS) resources. Provide a current regional assessment of protected conservation lands. This will be accomplished by compiling and standardizing datasets of protected areas from each state, including parks, wildlife refuges, wildlife management areas, forests, and other properties that have conservation as a management objective. C.) Overall Context The results of this project will benefit regional conservation coordination among the states in the Northeastern region. All 14 states or territories (Maine, Massachusetts, Vermont, New Hampshire, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Rhode Island, District of Columbia, West Virginia, and Virginia) of the Northeast Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies will participate. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) will also be a major partner. The Northeastern United states covers almost 250,000 miles2 with over 8,000 miles2 of water. Although it encompasses only 8% of the land area of the United States, it is home to more than 25% of the nations human population. Because of the high population density and rapid development, conservation actions to conserve imperiled species and habitat are critical. Habitat is the critical component in any wildlife conservation effort. There are many ways to describe and classify terrestrial and aquatic areas. By adopting standard terrestrial and aquatic wildlife habitat classification systems, all conservation agencies will have a common format for describing habitat. Habitat can then be consistently quantified and assessed across the Northeast region. These assessments will form the basis for regional conservation actions, as well as more detailed habitat mapping. A regional approach is essential for protecting species with critical habitat requirements which transcend geopolitical boundaries. This project will build upon historic and existing classifications and mapping initiatives. Within the Northeast, land cover, habitat, and vegetation have been mapped at various scales, for a variety of objectives, by different government agencies and organizations. Future mapping efforts are in their planning stages. Through fostering partnerships, this project seeks to promote effective mapping of habitat, with emphasis on protecting species of greatest conservation need. Land cover is a critical component in terrestrial habitat as well as a major indicator of water quality in adjacent aquatic systems. Because land cover is so important, an objective of this project is to make sure that each jurisdiction has access to the latest and most accurate land cover data, consistent with neighboring states in the region. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) has provided land cover through their National Land Cover Dataset (NLCD). Using satellite imagery from the early 1990s, the first version of NLCD was successful in providing a consistent, accurate, and synoptic land cover product for the continental United States. However, since land cover continually changes, the 1990s NLCD is sorely out-of-date. According to reports and communications, USGS will release a 2001 version of NLCD by December 2006. The USGS Gap Analysis Program (GAP) initially attempted to map terrestrial habitat in each state as part of an assessment of terrestrial vertebrate species richness. However, each state completed their mapping efforts independently with classification schemes, techniques, and quality varying considerably between states. Early attempts to map habitat were more focused on mapping vegetation communities at the Alliance level of the National Vegetation Classification System (NVCS) than true wildlife habitat. These maps were based on the same satellite imagery used to create the 1990s NLCD and are therefore also out-of-date. The majority of states in the Northeast did not use GAP land cover or vegetation maps within their SWAPs. The most recent iteration of GAP is based on regional mapping and assessments, thus making mapping products much more applicable for regional conservation initiatives. These newer efforts use NatureServes Ecological Systems classification system (Comer et al. 2003). Ecological Systems are groupings of Alliances, a floristic level of the NCVS, mapped with a higher degree of accuracy. While not a true habitat classification system, Ecological Systems are a much better approximation of wildlife habitat than are individual Alliances. One weakness of Ecological Systems is their focus on natural vegetation and lack of description of managed or human-impacted areas. Although natural vegetation is important, many wildlife species rely on altered habitats. Habitats for such declining species as the loggerhead shrike and barn owl are not adequately described in any Ecological System. The Southwestern regional GAP project has been completed and the Southeastern regional GAP is scheduled to be completed in September 2006. A Mid-Atlantic regional GAP, covering all or portions of Virginia, West Virginia, Maryland, and Delaware is currently in progress. According to USGS-GAP officials, a Northeast regional GAP is in the planning stage but will not be completed for several years. The proposed project will include a land cover map using Ecological Systems. One goal of this project is to coordinate with the emerging Northeast Regional GAP to promote a habitat-based classification system adopted by major end-users of GAP datasets, state fish and wildlife agencies. Another project using Ecological Systems is LANDFIRE. LANDFIRE is a consortium of agencies, led by the USDA Forest Service, mapping and modeling forest fire risk. Mapping vegetation is a critical step to assessing fuel loads and therefore an important component of LANDFIRE. Other spatial data created through LANDFIRE, such as vegetation structure and topographic factors will be valuable for classifying wildlife habitat. The National Fish Habitat Initiative (NFHI,  HYPERLINK "http://www.fishhabitat.org/plan/default.htm" http://www.fishhabitat.org/plan/default.htm) is a broad coalition of state and federal agencies as well as other interested organizations with the goal of assessing and improving the quality of fish habitat across the U.S. Mapping aquatic habitat using GIS is a primary objective under NFHIs Science and Data Strategy. NFHI plans to utilize aquatic habitat mapping techniques developed by The Nature Conservancy (Smith et al. 2002) and Aquatic GAP (Sowa et al. 2005). Aquatic GAP was initiated in several areas in conjunction with the USGS terrestrial GAP. Within the Northeast, a pilot aquatic GAP was completed for a watershed in New York. The Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries (VDGIF) completed an aquatic habitat classification as part of their SWAP. D.) Methodology This project will promote current mapping efforts, build partnerships to advance habitat mapping, create new GIS habitat datasets, and make those products available at regional and state scales. The project will be managed by a steering committee made up of the original project development team (Table 1). This steering committee will not only provide project oversight but will provide coordination and feedback to GAP, NFHI, LANDFIRE, and other initiatives. This committee will continue to coordinate habitat mapping activities in the Northeast beyond the life of this project. Table 1. Project Steering Committee NameTitleAgencyDavid MortonGIS CoordinatorVA Dept of Game and Inland FisheriesLarry NilesChief, Endangered & Non-game Species ProgramNJ Division of Fish and WildlifeAndrew MillikenAtl. Coast Joint Venture Coord.U.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceDavid DayConservation CoordinatorPA Fish and Boat CommissionMike BialouzGIS CoordinatorPA Fish and Boat CommissionJohn OLearyCWCS CoordinatorMA Division of Fish and WildlifeDan BrauningWildlife BiologistPA Game Commission Technical work will primarily be completed through contract(s) with university research centers or other organizations. All work will be reviewed and approved by the steering committee. The first step will be to gather information on habitat classification and mapping resources from each of the 14 jurisdictions and partners. Each jurisdiction will formally submit: Details of terrestrial habitat classifications or groupings, lists of critical habitat, and digital datasets used during the development of their Wildlife Action Plans. Details of aquatic habitat classifications or groupings, lists of critical aquatic habitat, and related digital datasets used during the development of their Wildlife Action Plans. GIS dataset of protected areas An accounting of GIS resources, including number of GIS staff, software/hardware used, and details of other spatial datasets important to their SWAP The information gathered will be compiled into a report to be reviewed by the steering committee and all member jurisdictions. Once the report is accepted, the first step will be to compile terrestrial and aquatic habitat classification systems used by each state in their SWAP. These compilations will be used to modify existing classification systems to develop standard terrestrial and aquatic habitat classification schemes. In jurisdictions where no terrestrial or aquatic classification exist, the steering committee and contractor(s) will work the jurisdiction to develop regionally-compatible habitat classes based on their features. The Northeastern Terrestrial Habitat Classification System, or NETHCS, will be based upon NatureServes Ecological Systems classification system. Both regional GAP and LANDFIRE intend to create Ecological System maps of the Northeast. This project will build upon these efforts and work with our conservation partners to ensure that habitat types important to wildlife, especially wildlife species within the SWAPs, are included in the GAP and LANDFIRE mapping efforts. Since the specific classes within the Ecological Systems classification are constantly evolving, the project team will use the results of the SWAP terrestrial habitat type compilation to guide the modification of Ecological Systems, thus creating the NETHCS. The timing to promote habitat types critical to imperiled wildlife is ideal. The coalition of Northeastern states represents a large user group for any detailed vegetation or habitat mapping effort. Once NETHCS is created, it will be used and promoted by each individual northeastern state and regionally. A similar process will be conducted for aquatic systems. The steering committee and the contractor(s) will partner with the NFHI and other groups such as TNC or USGS-GAP to obtain the latest standards and methods for classifying aquatic habitat. The contractor(s) will compile aquatic habitat classification systems, methods, and critical habitats reported by each state. This information will be used to develop the Northeastern Aquatic Habitat Classification System (NEAHCS). Once the survey results and initial terrestrial and aquatic habitat classification systems are created, a workshop will be held to foster communication and seek feedback from member jurisdictions. This will occur early in the development of both NETHCS and NEAHCS. The initial schemes and methods used will be presented and discussed, allowing each jurisdiction to provide input on both the processes and habitat classes prior to adoption of final classification schemes. It is expected that both the NETHCS and the NEAHCS will undergo several iterations prior to the completion of this project. This workshop will also serve as a forum to discuss methods used to compile and update spatial datasets of protected areas in the region and ways to standardize these into a regional product. All states and territories will be expected to participate. Each state will be responsible for its own travel and meeting expenses. The contractor(s) will assess the current version of Ecological System classification in the Northeast and identify areas needing modification in order to achieve a more habitat-oriented classification system. The contractor(s) will also crosswalk all classification systems used by each state or territory to the NETHCS. The result of these crosswalks will promote the use of the NETHCS by individual jurisdictions once it is complete, advancing work already completed at the state level. Each jurisdiction will work with the contractor to ensure that their method of describing wildlife habitat is effectively cross-walked to the NETHCS. The latest NCLD product will be available in December 2006, according to USGS. The contractor(s) will compile each dataset that covers the Northeast and qualitatively assess its accuracy and value for habitat assessments. The contractor(s) will edge-match and mosaic sections of the 2001 NLCD to create a seamless dataset, if necessary. The 2001 NLCD will be a valuable product, forming the upper levels of a habitat classification as well as the basis for more detailed habitat delineation using the NETHCS. The contractor(s) will also crosswalk all state aquatic classification systems to NEAHCS, using input from each state. Once NEAHCS is accepted, the contractor(s) will map aquatic habitat using stream reaches and waterbodies from the USGSs National Hydrography Dataset (NHD). The contractor(s) will complete this work for the entire region and make the final GIS datasets available through a central website. From data submitted by each state, the contractor(s) will compile a regional GIS dataset of protected areas. It is expected that the types of properties in each states submission will vary greatly. The contractor(s) will work with the states to achieve a regional consistency. Other groups such as USGS-GAP and The Nature Conservancy (TNC) may be partners in this effort. As the seamless 2001 NLCD, the terrestrial wildlife habitat classification system NETHCS, the aquatic habitat classification system NEAHCS, the aquatic habitat map, and the regional protected areas map are completed, data and information will be posted on a single project website. This website will be maintained by the contractor(s) for the purposes of project communication and data distribution. E.) Evaluation Objectives: Adopt and promote regional terrestrial and aquatic habitat classification systems. Create a Northeast regional aquatic habitat GIS dataset. Assess each partners habitat mapping capabilities. Provide a regional assessment and dataset of conservation protected areas. Framework: ActivitiesProject OutcomesPost-Project Outcomes-Survey jurisdictions for terrestrial and aquatic habitat classifications and critical habitat types -Review Ecological Systems -Modify Ecological Systems to adequately describe habitat Adoption of the NETHCS, a regional scheme for describing habitat.Standard way of describing, mapping, quantifying terrestrial habitat in Northeast. System will be foundation for future habitat mapping and conservation. -Review aquatic habitat classification methods & programs -Modify aquatic habitat classification systems to adequately describe features in NortheastAdoption of the NEAHCS, a regional scheme for describing habitat.Standard way of describing, mapping, & quantifying aquatic habitat in Northeast. System will be foundation for future habitat mapping & conservation. Attribute NHD with attributes defined in NEAHCSGIS dataset of aquatic habitat in the NortheastMap will allow states/region to quantifying aquatic habitat and to map potential species occurrenceSurvey each state/territory habitat mapping capabilityInventory of partners GIS resourcesBetter communication within habitat mapping & regional collaboration.Compile and standardized protected area GIS data from each stateRegional GIS dataset of protected areasBetter regional understanding of status & patterns of protected areas Indicators: Outcome: The adoption of the NETHCS, a regional scheme for describing habitat. Proposed Indicator: 90% of the Northeastern states and territories approve the NETHCS Baseline: No baseline. There is no terrestrial habitat classification system for the Northeast Predicted Value: 100% acceptance of the NETHCS Measurement: Each state/jurisdiction will be surveyed as to their satisfaction with the final NETHCS during creation of final project report Outcome: The adoption of the NAHCS, a regional scheme for describing habitat. Proposed Indicator: 90% of the Northeastern states and territories approve the NEAHCS Baseline: No baseline. There is no aquatic habitat classification system for the Northeast Predicted Value: 100% acceptance of the NEAHCS Measurement: Each state/jurisdiction will be surveyed as to their satisfaction with the final NEAHCS during creation of final project report. Outcome: GIS dataset of aquatic habitat in the Northeast Proposed Indicator: 90% of the Northeastern states approve the aquatic habitat GIS dataset Baseline: No baseline. There is no aquatic habitat GIS dataset for the Northeast Predicted Value: 100% acceptance of the aquatic habitat GIS dataset Measurement: Each state/jurisdiction will be surveyed as to their satisfaction with the final aquatic habitat GIS dataset during creation of final project report Outcome: Regional GIS dataset of protected areas Proposed Indicator: 90% of the Northeastern states approve the dataset of protected areas. Baseline: No baseline. There is no regional GIS dataset of protected areas for the Northeast Predicted Value: 100% acceptance of the regional GIS dataset of protected areas Measurement: Each state/jurisdiction will be surveyed as to their satisfaction with and use of the final regional dataset of protected areas during creation of final project report. F.) Dissemination Products developed through this project will be distributed through a central project website created and maintained by a contractor. This website will contain information on this project including: project description, project reports, detailed information about terrestrial and aquatic habitat classification systems, crosswalks from NETHCS and NEAHCS to each jurisdictions systems, contact information for project and GIS staff within each member jurisdiction, and downloadable GIS datasets. The GIS datasets to be distributed include: seamless Northeast regional 2001 NLCD, Northeast aquatic habitat, and Northeast protected areas. All GIS datasets distributed through this site will contain full Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) metadata records. G.) Partner Justification and Involvement This project was conceived at a regional meeting of representative states and territories in the Northeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies (NEAFWA). This project received the highest priority of all regional conservation initiatives discussed at this meeting. The project will involve all NEAFWA jurisdictions including: Maine, Massachusetts, Vermont, New Hampshire, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Rhode Island, District of Columbia, West Virginia, and Virginia. The list of representatives from each jurisdiction is listed in Table 2. Table 2. List of project representatives from each state, territory, or federal agency. NameAffiliationGeorge MatulaME Dept. Of Inland Fisheries & WildlifeJohn O'LearyMA Division of Fish & WildlifeJohn KartVT Fish & Wildlife Dept.John KanterNH Fish & Game Dept.Lisa HolstNY Dept. of Environmental Conservation Jenny DicksonCT Dept. of Environmental ProtectionLarry NilesNJ Division of Fish & WildlifeChristopher RaithelRI Dept. of Environmental ManagementDave DayPA Fish & Boat CommissionDan BrauningPA Game CommissionGlenn TherresMD Dept. of Natural ResourcesOlin AllenDE Division of Fish and WildlifeMary PfaffkoDC Fisheries & WildlifeBrian McDonaldWV Division of Natural ResourcesDave MortonVA Dept. of Game & Inland FisheriesAndrew MillikenUSFWS This project will be coordinated by a steering committee on behalf of NEAFWA (Table 1). Each person within this group brings different expertise in the areas of terrestrial habitat assessment, aquatic habitat mapping, GIS, and conservation planning. All individuals at the state-level had extensive input in their states Wildlife Action Plans. Andrew Milliken of the USFWS has had considerable experience coordinating habitat-based initiatives throughout the Northeast within his position of Atlantic Coast Joint Venture Coordinator. The Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries will receive and disperse funds on behalf and according to the direction of the steering committee. One or more contractorswill perform the technical work under the guidance of the steering committee. Individual steering committee members have contacted the Conservation Management Institute (CMI) at Virginia Tech and the Center for Remote Sensing and Spatial Analysis at Rutgers about the potential cost, feasibility and timeline for completing the tasks toward the projects objectives. This information was used during development of this proposal. Final contractor(s) will be chosen according to federal and state law and agency policy. References: Comer, P., D. Faber-Langedoen, R. Evans, S. Gawler, C. Josse, G. Kittel, S. Menard, M. Pyne, M. Reid, K. Schulz, K. Snow, and J. Teague. 2003. Ecological Systems of the United States: A Working Classification of U.S. Terrestrial Systems. NatureServe. http://www.natureserve.org/library/usEcologicalsystems.pdf Smith, R.K., P.L. Freeman, J.V. Higgins, K.S. Wheaton, T.W. FitzHugh, K.J. Ernstrom, A.A. Das. 2002. Priority Areas for Freshwater Conservation Action: A Biodiversity Assessment of the Southeastern United States. The Nature Conservancy. http://conserveonline.org/docs/2003/08/se_biodiv_assess.pdf Sowa, S. P., D. D. Diamond, R. Abbitt, G. Annis, T. Gordon, M. E. Morey, G. R. Sorensen, and D. True. 2005. A Gap Analysis for Riverine Ecosystems of Missouri. Final Report, submitted to the USGS National Gap Analysis Program. 1675 pp. http://www.cerc.usgs.gov/morap/projects/aquatic_gap/Aquatic_GAP_Final_Report.asp?project_id=1&project_name=Aquatic%20GAP%20Pilot%20Project&project_directory=aquatic_gap V. PROJECT BUDGET AND PHASING: B.) Budget Form Budget Category Justification Funds Requested from NFWFAnticipated In Kind ContributionsTotalContractual ServicesContract to complete technical work related to compiling terrestrial habitat classification systems and creating NETHCS59,500059,500Contractual ServicesContract to complete technical work related to compiling aquatic habitat classification, creating NEAHCS, and mapping aquatic habitat29,300029,300Contractual ServicesContract to complete technical work related to developing a standardized map of protected lands and distributing 2001 NLCD9,50009,500SalariesThis is an estimate of cost of staff time committed by state agency and federal partners to coordinate and complete this project. Assume 100 hours per organization, 16 organizations (14 jurisdictions, 2 in PA, 1 USFWS), and $25/hr40,000TravelThis is an estimate of cost of travel time by state agency and federal partners to attend a coordinating workshop in the center of the Northeastern US based on Virginia travel rates. Assume 32 travelers (2 from each agency), 3 days per diem @ $49, 2 nights lodging 20 rooms @$109, ave. distance of 200 miles @ $0.19/mile *16 vehicles 9700 Total In Kind: $49,700 Total Requested: $98,300 C.) Project Phasing Project Phase 1: Collect and review terrestrial habitat classification systems from each state Collect and review protected land data from each state Create initial crosswalk of Ecological Systems to each states system Complete assessment of aquatic habitat classification techniques and initiatives Conduct a workshop on habitat classifications Create a project websiteBudget CategoryNFWF FundsContractual Services34,600Anticipated Partner Contributions for Phase 1:29,700TOTAL$34,600Project Phase 2 Finalize Northeastern Terrestrial Habitat Classification System (NETHCS) Finalize Northeastern Aquatic Habitat Classification System (NEAHCS) Create a report on habitat quantification capabilities of each jurisdictionBudget CategoryNFWF FundsContractual Services:29,500Anticipated Partner Contributions for Phase X:10,000TOTAL$29,500Final Project Phase: Complete aquatic habitat map Complete regional map of protected lands Complete a report on recommendations for promoting NETHCS and partnering to complete a map using NETHCS Complete final reportBudget CategoryNFWF FundsContractual Services:34,200Anticipated Partner Contributions for Final Phase:10,000TOTAL$34,200NFWF PROJECT TOTAL$98,300 PAGE  PAGE 11 ;Q* *  , - 0 3 7 8 ø~qqkee hEnCJ h-CJh }h-CJmH sH h }h1*s<mH sH h }h1*smH sH h }hOmH sH h }hEnmH sH h }hEnCJmH sH h }h-mH sH  h }CJh-h-CJ h->*CJ h-CJ h-6 h-5 h-5CJhVHh-5CJaJh-';Q W+ ;0p@ P !$`'0*-/ ^` gd-# ;0p@ P !$`'0*-/gd-# ;0fp@ P !$`'0*-/gd-&$ ;0fp@ P !$`'0*-/a$gd-$a$gd-gd-   8 W+ ;0p@ P !$`'0*-/ ^ `gd-# ;0p@ P !$`'0*-/gd-+ ;0p@ P !$`'0*-/ ^` gd }+ ;0p@ P !$`'0*-/ ^` gd-  $ % , : B O Y v  !";<KRS xĽܧʂ{ h\n>*CJh\nh\nCJh }h }5CJ\^JaJh }h }5CJ\ h }CJh- h-5 h-6CJ h->*CJ hwACJh\nh-CJh\nhwACJ h\nCJhEnhEnCJhEnh-CJ hEnCJ h-CJ0 % O "#$<b% >p~ xHP !$`'0*-/gd\n ^`gd- ^`gd- p^p`gd-  p@ PP^P`gd-  p@ PP^P`gdEn `^``gd- 6yX+ ;pxHP !$`'0*-/^`gd-- >~ @ xHP !$`'0*-/^`gd-) >p~ xHP !$`'0*-/^gd\n% >p~ xHP !$`'0*-/gd\n2@Adpqr:mpq#$+,Rjv'3AOZ]_`  <=jkƽƽƽϽƽϽƽϽƽϽƴϽϽ h\n5 ha`5hwAhwA5hwAhJ$CJhwAh%~CJhwAh-CJhwAh(CJhwAhwACJ hwACJhCah-CJ h(>*CJ h(CJ h\nCJ h-CJ:Bqr:,'`gd-- >p~ xHP !$`'0*-/^`gd-. Ap~ xH4P !$`'0*-/^`gd-?m/0Dyz{+ ; @ P !$`'0*-/2^`gd-  ~ xH@ 2gd-+ ;p@ P !$`'0*-/2^`gd- ^`gdwA,-.0DYZ[bcdpwxyz{ ׸Чݔה݋vvhwAha`CJ hCJ ha`CJhwAhsKrCJ h-6CJhsKrhsKr5>*CJ hsKr>*CJhsKrh->*CJhsKrhsKr>*CJ h-6CJ h\n>*CJ h->*CJ h-CJ h-5CJh- h }5hwAhwA5 h\n5 hwA5.{zdW>Wxxssf ^`gdsKrgdsKr- >p~ xHP !$`'0*-/^`gda`- >p~ xHP !$`'0*-/^`gdsKr- >8 @ P !$`'0*-/2^`gd-  cU $9:=dh}~n 8MNVWɿɿɿѸѧѬѢ hsKr5 hSE5hSEhSE5hSE hSEhSE h5 ha`5ha`ha`5hwAhsKr5ha`ha`CJ hCJhwAha`CJ ha`CJhwAhsKrCJ@(=>?cxy ! " % 7 ; !)!+!.!C!J!!!!"""'"/""""""""7#I#J#####$U%V%_%hRW6h]* hIz5>*hsKr hsKr5 hsKr>* h->* h-5hSEhsKr5 h5hSEhSE5=W ! " 6 7 O P """"`gdTgd } ^`gdsKrgd- ^`gd- ^`gdsKr"J##($k!I & FEƀ1cgd }I & FEƀ1cgd }I & FEƀ1cgd }($$$U%%%%%%%[VVVVVgd }I & FEƀ1cgd } & Fgdt & Fgd }I & FEƀ1cgd } _%%%%%%%%%%&&&&&&&&''''''''Q(i((((()))))))***S*`*w**+S+T+]+++++++q,r,,,,,hRW6h"FhTh<hyhdoh;= hh4h[y hhw/Ch h?H*h?h?H* hw/CH*hw/Ch? h5>*hIzhybhhy=%),|00(1t11111G2634b5I & FEƀ1c.gd } & Fgd }gd } & Fgd:g & Fgd }gdT`gdy`gdT,,,-<-=-c-d-f-i--..A.D.R.Z.\.c.j.r..... /+/:/r/u///0S0w0|000%1'1(1r1s1t11111133374444444l5t555555666T6V6W6Z666666h%hlh#(/h(]hIzhhRW6h:ghHhTthb9h"FhThh<Mb566668 :<u>?A!HJLOOPPMRNRsRxR~RR $Ifgd }gd } & Fgd }668888888 : :e::::;$;0;6;9;D;E;P;U;X;e;{;|;; <<<<<<<<<<=*=L=N=i=k=n======v>w>??n@o@@@@A(AAAA>C^CkD׿뺵 hTt] h] hL]W]hHhz|hAhxhqh fwhTthih&"h%h(hR hRH*hE8hhL]WCkDoDDDDDDEEEEEFFFF*G2G3G*CJaJhX~hH%hjh%]h^ghL]WhhIzh%,B h%]] hI] h] hH%]8RRRRRqhhh $Ifgd }kd$$IfsFd$tc , t0%6    44 saRRRS$Sneee $Ifgd }kdz$$Ifs4Fd$tc , t0%6    44 saf4$S%S5SUStSneee $Ifgd }kd1$$Ifs4Fd$tc , t0%6    44 saf4tSuSSSSneee $Ifgd }kd$$Ifs4Fd$tc , t0%6    44 saf4SSSSSneee $Ifgd }kd$$Ifs4Fd$tc , t0%6    44 saf4SSS T.Tneee $Ifgd }kdV$$Ifs4Fd$tc , t0%6    44 saf4SS TT.T/T;T.T/ThZwhhy2vh?hih^hFh h$9Me`dfh*jk=m>mMmNmZmmmnjnknvnnnn $Ifgd } & Fgd }gd }i)j*j+j\j_jkkgkkkkkkllll=m>mBmMmNmvnxnnnooEpFpGpMpXpppp'qEqqqqq"r'r(r6r8r}r~rrrss s!ssssss轲hCJaJhh^CJaJhshh)CJaJhhsCJaJhhe>*CJaJhhs>*CJaJh'hIzhehhZwhFhh)*hh+>*h+h+>*h+hehh>*hFh0P)hE-tttuuuuIvvvewfwwwOxx7y8yjyy%zvz-{.{@{A{@~A~k~l~gd }z~ %&\]ρЁ78cd‚<=bcăŃۃ܃݃ރ+7U[„67]iŽŽŽhDv[hoghiNqh9 hsh4hh0P)CJaJh0P)CJaJhh0P)>*CJaJh0P)hjh6oh'Hl~%&4\okd9 $$Ifl0d ''0_644 lap$Ifgd }\]jztt$Ifkd $$Ifl0d ''0_644 lapztt$Ifkd $$Ifl0d ''0_644 lapρztt$Ifkda $$Ifl0d ''0_644 lapρЁہztt$Ifkd $$Ifl0d ''0_644 lap7ztt$Ifkd $$Ifl0d ''0_644 lap78Dcztt$Ifkd $$Ifl0d ''0_644 lapcdxztt$IfkdA$$Ifl0d ''0_644 lapztt$Ifkd$$Ifl0d ''0_644 lap‚ςztt$Ifkd$$Ifl0d ''0_644 lapztt$Ifkdi$$Ifl0d ''0_644 lap<ztt$Ifkd!$$Ifl0d ''0_644 lap<=Jbztt$Ifkd$$Ifl0d ''0_644 lapbcrztt$Ifkd$$Ifl0d ''0_644 lapăztt$IfkdI$$Ifl0d ''0_644 lapăŃՃۃztt$Ifkd$$Ifl0d ''0_644 lapۃ܃݃ˆÈ+,zuuuuuppppppgdDv[gd }kd$$Ifl0d ''0_644 lap ˆÈÉ+-ÌŌƌnj 23TUZqёґّڑޑǪ~r~ghD^hsKrCJaJhhsKr6CJaJhhsKrCJaJ hsKrhsKrhdhsKr5 hdhsKr hsKr5h9 hDv[hog!h)hDv[B*CJ^JaJphh)hDv[6CJaJh)hDv[CJaJh6h6CJaJh6CJaJ hDv[hsKr hDv[hDv[hDv[hsKr&,-ƌ 3?GU[ $Ifgda` $$Ifa$gda`gdsKr* 8 @ P !$`'0*-/2^`gdsKrgdDv[[\qvmmaaa $$Ifa$gda` $Ifgda`kdq$$If4erL<6$$4 adf4vmmaaa $$Ifa$gda` $Ifgda`kdp$$If4rL<6$$4 adf46<>Dvmmaaa $$Ifa$gda` $Ifgda`kdE$$If4rL<6$$4 adf4DEN67>?vmmaaa $$Ifa$gda` $Ifgda`kd($$If4rL<6$$4 adf4?@Gvmmaaa $$Ifa$gda` $Ifgda`kd $$If4rL<6$$4 adf4ڑۑܑݑޑvqhhhqqqqqq^gdsKrgdsKrkd$$If4rL<6$$4 adf4 Tђ"Piy $$Ifa$gda`+ & F ;h8 t"$`'0*-/2p5@8;=@C$Ifgda`( ;h8 t"$`'0*-/2p5@8;=@C$Ifgda` Ohixyٓߓݔޔ OUV[\cdeghiDST^_`ʺʺƯhbhsKr5CJaJhbhsKrCJaJ *hD^hsKrCJaJhsKrhhsKrCJaJhhsKr5CJaJhD^hsKr5CJaJhD^hsKrCJaJhsKrCJaJ@4kd$$Ifl4\X $``dF (0$4 lalf4p( $Ifgda`( ;h8 t"$`'0*-/2p5@8;=@C$Ifgda`4kdY$$Ifl4\X $  dF (#0$4 lalf4p(#`vkd$$Ifl40  d0$ 4 lalf4( ;h8 t"$`'0*-/2p5@8;=@C$Ifgda`ٓ]5) $$Ifa$gda`( ;h8 t"$`'0*-/2p5@8;=@C$Ifgda`+$ ;h8 t"$`'0*-/2p5@8;=@C$Ifa$gda`vkdb$$Ifl40  d0$ 4 lalf4kd$$Ifl4\X $  F   0$4 lalf4p( ;h8 t"$`'0*-/2p5@8;=@C$Ifgda``W $Ifgda`vkdq $$Ifl4O0$ < 0$4 lalf4( ;h8 t"$`'0*-/2p5@8;=@C$Ifgda`Mޔ $$Ifa$gda`+ & F ;h8 t"$`'0*-/2p5@8;=@C$Ifgda`4kd.!$$Ifl4\X $``dF (0$4 lalf4p( $Ifgda`( ;h8 t"$`'0*-/2p5@8;=@C$Ifgda`?( ;h8 t"$`'0*-/2p5@8;=@C$Ifgda`kd"$$Ifl4\X $  dF 0$4 lalf4p`vkd#$$Ifl40  d0$ 4 lalf4( ;h8 t"$`'0*-/2p5@8;=@C$Ifgda` OV\]5) $$Ifa$gda`( ;h8 t"$`'0*-/2p5@8;=@C$Ifgda`+$ ;h8 t"$`'0*-/2p5@8;=@C$Ifa$gda`vkd$$$Ifl40  d0$ 4 lalf4\dekdF%$$Ifl4\X $  F  0$4 lalf4p( ;h8 t"$`'0*-/2p5@8;=@C$Ifgda`efghi)kd|&$$Ifl4FX $F    0$    4 lalf4p( ;h8 t"$`'0*-/2p5@8;=@C$Ifgda` $$Ifa$gda`i~ƕ.DT_ $$Ifa$gda`- & F ?!h8 t"$`'0*-/2p5@8;=@C$Ifgda` $Ifgda`( ;h8 t"$`'0*-/2p5@8;=@C$Ifgda`_`4kd'$$Ifl4\X $``dF (0$4 lalf4p(`abx $Ifgda`( ;h8 t"$`'0*-/2p5@8;=@C$Ifgda``bvx~ŖƖ͖Ζϖ h*10JmHnHu h*10Jjh*10JUh*1 hD~h*1 hDv[hsKrhhsKr5CJaJhhsKrCJaJhsKrhsKrCJaJhbhsKrCJaJ&4kd)$$Ifl4\X $  dF (#0$4 lalf4p(#`vkdX*$$Ifl40  d0$ 4 lalf4( ;h8 t"$`'0*-/2p5@8;=@C$Ifgda`Ɩ]5) $$Ifa$gda`( ;h8 t"$`'0*-/2p5@8;=@C$Ifgda`+$ ;h8 t"$`'0*-/2p5@8;=@C$Ifa$gda`vkd+$$Ifl40  d0$ 4 lalf4ƖΖϖkd+$$Ifl4\X $  F   0$4 lalf4p( ;h8 t"$`'0*-/2p5@8;=@C$Ifgda`ϖЖ)kd -$$Ifl4FX $F    0$    4 lalf4p( ;h8 t"$`'0*-/2p5@8;=@C$Ifgda` $$Ifa$gda`  &`#$gd*1gdD~gdDv[gdsKr *&P1h:pI/ =!"#$%DyK yK Xhttp://www.fishhabitat.org/plan/default.htm$$If!vh5t5c 5,#vt#vc #v,:V s t0%65t5c 5,4 s$$If!vh5t5c 5,#vt#vc #v,:V s4 t0%65t5c 5,4 sf4$$If!vh5t5c 5,#vt#vc #v,:V s4 t0%65t5c 5,4 sf4$$If!vh5t5c 5,#vt#vc #v,:V s4 t0%65t5c 5,4 sf4$$If!vh5t5c 5,#vt#vc #v,:V s4 t0%65t5c 5,4 sf4$$If!vh5t5c 5,#vt#vc #v,:V s4 t0%65t5c 5,4 sf4$$If!vh5t5c 5,#vt#vc #v,:V s4 t0%65t5c 5,4 sf4$$If!vh5t5c 5,#vt#vc #v,:V s4 t0%65t5c 5,4 sf4s$$If!vh5|5$ 5#v|#v$ #v:Vl t%65|5$ 5s$$If!vh5|5$ 5#v|#v$ #v:Vl t%65|5$ 5s$$If!vh5|5$ 5#v|#v$ #v:Vl t%65|5$ 5s$$If!vh5|5$ 5#v|#v$ #v:Vl t%65|5$ 5s$$If!vh5|5$ 5#v|#v$ #v:Vl t%65|5$ 5s$$If!vh5|5$ 5#v|#v$ #v:Vl t%65|5$ 5$$If!vh55#v#v:V l0_6,559ap$$If!vh55#v#v:V l0_6,559ap$$If!vh55#v#v:V l0_6,559ap$$If!vh55#v#v:V l0_6,559ap$$If!vh55#v#v:V l0_6,559ap$$If!vh55#v#v:V l0_6,559ap$$If!vh55#v#v:V l0_6,559ap$$If!vh55#v#v:V l0_6,559ap$$If!vh55#v#v:V l0_6,559ap$$If!vh55#v#v:V l0_6,559ap$$If!vh55#v#v:V l0_6,559ap$$If!vh55#v#v:V l0_6,559ap$$If!vh55#v#v:V l0_6,559ap$$If!vh55#v#v:V l0_6,559ap$$If!vh55#v#v:V l0_6,559ap$$If!vh55#v#v:V l0_6,559ap$$If!vh55#v#v:V l0_6,559ap$$Ifd!vh55555#v#v#v#v#v:V 4e$55555/ /  / / / 44 adf4$$Ifd!vh55555#v#v#v#v#v:V 4$55555/  / 44 adf4$$Ifd!vh55555#v#v#v#v#v:V 4$55555/  / / 44 adf4$$Ifd!vh55555#v#v#v#v#v:V 4$55555/  / / 44 adf4$$Ifd!vh55555#v#v#v#v#v:V 4$55555/ / / / 44 adf4$$Ifd!vh55555#v#v#v#v#v:V 4$55555/ / / / 44 adf4j$$Ifl!vh55d5F5#v#vd#vF#v:V l4 (0$++55d5F5/ /  / / 4alf4p(N$$Ifl!vh55d5F5#v#vd#vF#v:V l4 (#0$++55d5F5/ / 4alf4p(#$$Ifl!vh55d#v#vd:V l40$ ++55d/ 4alf4$$Ifl!vh55d#v#vd:V l40$ ++55d/ 4alf4T$$Ifl!vh555F5#v#v#vF#v:V l4 0$,555F5/ / /  / 4alf4p$$Ifl!vh55<#v#v<:V l4O0$55</  / 4alf4$$Ifl!vh55d5F5#v#vd#vF#v:V l4 (0$++55d5F5/ / / / / /  / 4alf4p(*$$Ifl!vh55d5F5#v#vd#vF#v:V l4 0$++55d5F5/ 4alf4p$$Ifl!vh55d#v#vd:V l40$ ++55d4alf4$$Ifl!vh55d#v#vd:V l40$ ++55d4alf44$$Ifl!vh555F5#v#v#vF#v:V l4 0$,555F5/ /  4alf4p$$Ifl!vh55F5#v#vF#v:V l4 0$55F5/  / / /  4alf4pj$$Ifl!vh55d5F5#v#vd#vF#v:V l4 (0$++55d5F5/ /  / / 4alf4p(N$$Ifl!vh55d5F5#v#vd#vF#v:V l4 (#0$++55d5F5/ / 4alf4p(#$$Ifl!vh55d#v#vd:V l40$ ++55d/ 4alf4$$Ifl!vh55d#v#vd:V l40$ ++55d/ 4alf4T$$Ifl!vh555F5#v#v#vF#v:V l4 0$,555F5/ / /  / 4alf4p$$Ifl!vh55F5#v#vF#v:V l4 0$55F5/  / / /  4alf4p@@@ +NormalCJ_HaJmH sH tH J@J sKr Heading 4$<@&5CJ\aJ@ - Heading 5Y$ >p~ xHP !$`'0*-/@&^` 5CJaJDA@D Default Paragraph FontVi@V  Table Normal :V 44 la (k@(No List 4@4 Header  !4 @4 Footer  !B'B Comment ReferenceCJaJ<@"<  Comment TextCJaJH2H  Balloon TextCJOJQJ^JaJ@j!"@ Comment Subject5\j@Sj e Table Grid7:V06U@a6 Y Hyperlink >*B*ph@O@ Dv[ Normal+64 7$8$H$OJQJ.)@. D~ Page NumberC@ -Body Text IndentM ,h P !$`' (1$7$8$H$^ `(CJaJ2B@2 sKr Body Textx\ ;Q8%O"#$<6yBqr  : , ' `  ? m  / 0 D yz{zdW>W !"67OPJ(U!$|((()t)))))G*6+,b-....0 24u679!@BDGGHHMJNJsJxJ~JJJJJJJJK$K%K5KUKtKuKKKKKKKKKK L.L/LeMeNeZeeefjfkfvfffffg+gfggEhFhhhiiiij}j~jjj k!kbkkkkkk-lllmmmmInnneofoooOpp7q8qjqq%rvr-s.s@sAs@vAvkvlvxxyy%y&y4y\y]yjyyyyyyyyyyzzz7z8zDzczdzxzzzzzzzzzz{{{<{={J{b{c{r{{{{{{{{{{}€À+,-Ƅ 3?GU[\q6<>DEN67>?@Gډۉ܉݉މTъ"PiyًMތ OV\defghi~ƍ.DT_`abxƎΎώЎ 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000H0H0H0H0H0H0H0H0H0H0H0H000 00 H00 0 x0 x0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H0H0H00H00Wx0W00W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W 0W 0W 0W 0W 0W 0W 0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W 0W 0W 0W 0W0W0W0W 0W 0W 0W 0W 0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W 0W 0W 0W 0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W0W 0W 0W 0W 0W0X000@ 0@ 0@ 0D 0@0@0@ 0@ 0@ 0D 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000000000000000000000000000000x0h0h0p0h0p0@ 0@ 0D 0@ 0@ 0D 0@ 0@ 0D 0@ 0@ 0D 0@ 0@ 0D 0@ 0@ 0D 0@ 0@ 0D 0@ 0@ 0D 0@ 0@ 0D 0@ 0@ 0D 0@ 0@ 0D 0@ 0@ 0D 0@ 0@ 0D 0@ 0@ 0D 0@ 0@ 0D 0@ 0@ 0D 0@ 0@ 0D 000p0p0x00000x00x0x0x0x0x0x00x0x0x0@ 0@ 0@ 0@0@0@ 0@ 0D 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0D 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0D 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0D 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0D 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0D 0000000000x0@0@  0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0D 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0D 0@ 0@ 0D 0@ 0@ 0D 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0D 0@ 0@ 0D 0@0@0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0D 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0D 0@ 0@ 0D 0@ 0@ 0D 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0D 0@ 0@ 0@ 0D 0@0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0D 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0D 0@ 0@ 0D 0@ 0@ 0D 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0D 0@ 0@ 0@ 0D 000@0@0P@0 {00 {00@0@0 {000 Xf ;Q8%"#$<' ` D {zdW> !67OPJ(U!$|((()t)))))G*6+,b-....0 24u67!@BDGHHMJNJsJxJ~JJJJJJJJK$K%K5KUKtKuKKKKKKKKKK L.L/LeMeNeZeeefjfkfvfffff+gfggEhFhhhiiiij}j~jjj k!kbkkkkkk-lllmmmmInnneofoooOpp7q8qjqq%rvr-s.s@sAs@vAvkvlvxxyy%y4y\yjyyyyyyyzz7zDzczxzzzzzzz{{<{J{b{r{{{{{{{}À+,-[\DE?@iyًތOV\defghi~DT_`abxƎΎώЎ|00@0|00|00|00|00|00|00|00|00|00|00|00|00|00|00|00|00|00|00|00|00;00;00>{00>{00>{00>{00|00|00|00|00|00|00|00>{00>{00>{00>{00>{00>{00;0%0;0%0|00|00|00;0+0>{00@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@ 0@ 0@ 0 0@0@0@0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@0@0@0{0?0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0{0n0{0n0{0n0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@ 0@ 0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0;0t0{00{00{00{00{00{00{00{00{00{00{00{00{00{00{00{00{00{00{00{00 {00 {00 {00{00 {00 {00 {0000{00{00{00{00{00{00{00{00{00{00{00{00{00{00{00{00{00{00{00@0@0@0@0@0{00{00{00{00{00 @0@0{00{00{00{00 {00 {00 {00 {00 {00 {00 {00 {00 {00 {00 {00 {00 {00 {00 {00 {00 {00 {00 {00 {00 {00 {00 {00 {00 {00 {00 {00 {01 {00 {0 1 {00 {00 {00 {00{00{00@0@0@0@0@0@0@0|050|050 q|00 |070 q|00 |090 q|00 |0;0 q|00 |0=0 q|00 |0?0 q|00 |00|0 0|0 0|00|0 0|00 |0 0|00|00|0 0|00 |00|00|00|00|00|00|00|00|00 |00 |00 |00 |00|00|00 |00 |00 |00 |00 |00 |00 |00 |00 |00 |0 0 |0 0 |00 |00 |00 |00 |00 |00 |00 |00 |00 |00 |00 |00|00 |00 |00 |00 |00 |00 |00 |00 |00 |00 |0 0 |0 0 |00 |00 |00 |00 |00 |00 |00 |00 |00 |00 @0  @0{000{C,3Hd00 0(ߎ ! _%,6kDNSaZbisz~O`LPSVXY]_abcjmnpwy {W"($%b5RR$StSSS.TbTe`nEpq}r ss-tl~\ρ7c<băۃ,[D?\ei_`ƖϖMOQRTUWZ[\^`defghikloqrstuvxz{|}~NDDEX !!!8@0(  B S  ?"N #N$N%N4^&N'N,(N)Nl*N\+N,N-N.N/Nt0N41N2N3N4Nt5N6N}7N8N"9N":Nl;NN?N@NlAN,BNDCNDNENFN_GNHNtIN|JNKNLNlMNԜNNON$PNQN|RNSNDHTNLUN VN<WNXNYN$ZND[N \N]N^NM_N`N,?aN|bNcNdNeNfNMgNDMhNMiNMjNNkNDNlNNmNNnNOoNDOpNOqNOrNsNtN<uN|vNwNxN<yN|zN{N|N<}N|~NNN<N|NHNHNINDINININJNDJNJNJNKNDKNKNKNLNDLNLN<N|NNN<N|NNN<N|NNN< N| N N N< N| Nl N N N, Nl N N N, Nl N N N,NlNNN,NlNNNN4NtNNN4NtNNN4NtNNN4}#  ''77AAKKapp2 , , ` ` ? ? m m   s#s#######M/M/T/T/c/c/l/l/{/{/////////////////0/1/188];];@@@@AAAAEEeGeG5K5K:KUKUKwwwwwwwwwwwwx x xxx%x%x/x/x=x=xSxfxfxnnÃÃΈ      !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;=<>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZ[\]^_`acbdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxy{z|}~!((  %%33??II_nnxxA   9 9 j j G G ########R/R/a/a/j/j/y/y///////////////////0<1<188e;e;@@@@AAAAEEmGmG9K?K?KYKYKwwwwwwwwwww x xxx#x#x-x-x;x;xQx`x`xnxnx{{Ԃ˃˃݈  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;=<>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZ[\]^_`acbdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxy{z|}~ 8*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsdateB*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagscountry-region9*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsplace;*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsaddress>*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags PostalCode:*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsStreet=g*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags PlaceName=(*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags PlaceType8*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsCity9*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsState  11522006200858DayMonthYear   ggg(G L ##<<FF5K8KNKSKKK3L;Lyaa-y3yyyyypzwzzzzzB{I{~~׀ <DKSZ]LRW\cf wz: K > O 3 ; n  ^%d%t)~),,UA^ANJVJQQiuruxxxyւ 33333333333333333333333333333$Hp0 6 "(t))))))..GHNJJJJ5KUKK L/LdL5OUO>eekffFhhqii.sBsy=y]yjyyyzDzdzz{{={r{{{{{Á-̓w6N7Gъ"Pً O.  DGIF mN*|2"*jS% >`6(Us>Qx(XX(*PM[5/#ve:LEf uiuh^`.h^`.hpLp^p`L.h@ @ ^@ `.h^`.hL^`L.h^`.h^`.hPLP^P`L.h^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohpp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohPP^P`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohpp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohPP^P`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohpp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohPP^P`OJQJo(hH^`o(. ^`hH. pLp^p`LhH. @ @ ^@ `hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. PLP^P`LhH.h^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohpp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohPP^P`OJQJo(hH^`o(. ^`hH. pLp^p`LhH. @ @ ^@ `hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. PLP^P`LhH.h^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohpp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohPP^P`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohpp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohPP^P`OJQJo(hHh ^`hH.h ^`hH.h pLp^p`LhH.h @ @ ^@ `hH.h ^`hH.h L^`LhH.h ^`hH.h ^`hH.h PLP^P`LhH. >`6mEfPM[Us>QuiXX"S%#ve                                                                                           X[%Gz6;= H %~)&I"Fj+ (=&"J$ %(38(E(0P)7*_u+#(/>}/*14RW6E8$9b94:!z:?2@?W@A%,Bw/CSE(DHlLNMghUmV"WL]W*,ZDv[<] o^_^gflylkm\n6o]ilH%^!)Iye }a`':;xOns-{0^doF2et<VR(]iG eSwA%EnqYIz^yb{u9 2FCTsJxJ~JJJJJJJJK$K%K5KUKtKuKKKKKKKKKK L.L/LDEN67>?@Giyًތ OV\defghiDT_`abxƎΎώЎ@4C$@UnknownhallsGz Times New Roman5Symbol3& z Arial5& z!Tahoma?5 z Courier New;Wingdings"qhff狥fUyIUyI!24d 3QH,?Project AbstractDGIFDGIF4         Oh+'0   < H T `lt|Project AbstractdrojDGIFct GIFGIF Normal.dottDGIFl.d3IFMicrosoft Word 10.0@b@jy@ۣy@yUy՜.+,D՜.+,@ hp  DGIFwIO Project Abstract Title 8@ _PID_HLINKSA"0,http://www.fishhabitat.org/plan/default.htm  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~      !"#$%'()*+,-/012345:Root Entry F@By<Data @.1TableýWordDocument,\SummaryInformation(&DocumentSummaryInformation8.CompObjj  FMicrosoft Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q