ࡱ> 87 \pSusan Ba==x 1000 sq.mi.Buffer % AgricultureBuffer % NaturalBuffer % Impervious(% Watershed Occurrences without NID DamsL% Mainstem Occurrences of this size class without NID Dams (in NAP boundary)Watershed % AgricultureWatershed % ImperviousWatershed % Natural1% Watersheds With No NID Dams in Size 3 Watershed9% Watersheds With No NID Dam on the Size 3 River SectionC% Watersheds With No NID Dam on the Size 3 or Size 2 River Section% Natural Size 2 Watershed% Natural Size 3 Watershed0% Natural 100m buffer of size 2 and size 3 river% Impervious Size 2 Watershed% Impervious Size 3 Watershed3% Impervious 100m buffer of size 2 and size 3 river% Agriculture Size 2 Watershed% Agriculture Size 3 Watershed4% Agriculture 100m buffer of size 2 and size 3 riverAverage # dams per stream mile Grand TotalRiver Size ClassA1 Dam per X Stream Miles for All Priority 1 Portfolio OccurrencesG1 Dam per X Stream Miles for Priority 1 Portfolio Occurrences with damsA1 Dam per X Stream Miles for All Priority 9 Portfolio Occurrences@1 Dam per X Stream Miles for All Portfolio Occurrences with damsSize 2Size 3Size 4Buffer % GAP123 Size 1 Buffer % GAP123 Size 2Buffer % GAP123 Size 3 Buffer % GAP123 Size 4Buffer % GAP123 Size 1-4Buffer % GAP12 Size 1 Buffer % GAP12 Size 2Buffer % GAP12 Size 3 Buffer % GAP12 Size 4Buffer % GAP12 Size 1-4+% Conservation Land GAP12 Size 3 Watersheds,% Conservation Land GAP123 Size 3 Watersheds+% Conservation Land GAP 12 Size 2 Watershed,% Conservation Land GAP 123 Size 2 WatershedBuffer % GAP123 Size 234Buffer % GAP12 for Size234 !Buffer % GAP123 Conservation Land Buffer % GAP12 Conservation LandBEcoregional Statistics Comparing Portfolio and Non Portfolio: Based on NLCD land cover from EPA based on 1992 imagery, Conservation/Managed Lands from TNC Eastern Region Compilation as of 3/2004, National Inventory of Dams from EPA Basins 1999, the TNC aquatic size classification, and the TNC Portfolio Codes as of 2/2006$Ecoregional Averages for some buffer, watershed, and dam statistics: Based on NLCD land cover from EPA based on 1992 imagery, Conservation/Managed Lands from TNC Eastern Region Compilation as of 3/2004, National Inventory of Dams from EPA Basins 1999, and the TNC aquatic size classification.B im   I1  Qucc  #$377  dMbP?_*+%M HP4200DTN,C odXXLetter DINU"4 D~ IUPHdLetter [none] [none]Arial4Pd?TNCADMINIVEROUNTITLED    SSP_STDPAGE1"dXX??U} .} $ } m } } } } I} } $#@      $;$$$$$      ##### ހaW@,]W@>W[1U@vU@Lq9V@ !           ! " # $ % ;4xV@KV@gpV@~U@XGV@ &:3Kސ? z8? F|'f? Qα?   &oyZYN@)R @~VS@~V3@ x-W@-_uW@˨ P@ Z/V@_E?V@ '6)ߚ? i|+Ǩ? 蹁? 紿m?   'fB e D@rف9.@y0H@hf!? 0K@ƫ@t˪%@8Zs -&@S)S@ (yD? MbX9? ^)? |F?   (0\J@%p4@)kkJ@)kkJ@ (x@̡E@@wh@>%@c= @  2tg? *ûVNc? YN? T E,?     lK@< 7%@Jtv@=@ q$@Bz*:@@3@?~@̄`.@  8?>ޘÀ?1Zd?hUM?&?  ,#9? ٬\? xN5? mw? ?  ~CN? m7? J<$ @ /mUC@ j@ 5 њ,@ 8`^@ )@/(@ 8涺['@+Vh @n>@>{*5@2ysw!@ R@mާdR@~ R@KJ@P}fOP@ @@~ B@$I$I,@A@v)Y7@@ 0@n0E>"@ F@ K@~ )@Kh/9@mʄC@ $I$I,@v)Y7 @Dtl"|hhhhhdhhhhhhhhhdhhhhddNd"">@ 7   IM  dMbP?_*+%M \\ERO-PUFFIN\HP4200DTN,C odXXLetter DINU"4 D~ IUPHdLetter [none] [none]Arial4Pd?SKHANNARATORUNTITLED    SSP_STDPAGE1"dXX??U} #} } } } m W@    %<%%%%      [@@@@ ~ @ Lq9V@~ g@!  !P@"@"@"r@ N@M@S@!  px@0@@Pz@ `@@@@! 9F@<@L@@ : ^Ӥ*@ B3P"@ F!@ \6~@  "@W@"C@" @"  "@W@"@P@"@@",@v B0F04040V0>@ 7 Oh+'0HPx  Conservation Science SupportSusanMicrosoft Excel@BP_1@q)@ |՜.+,0 PXx  The Nature Conservancy Portfolio ComparisonsEcoreg Avg By River Size  Worksheets  !"#$%&()*+,-.0123456Root Entry FWorkbookMSummaryInformation('DocumentSummaryInformation8/