
Flow alteration is computed for each river segment and expressed as the deviation of developed-condition flows from baseline-condition flows, using a small set of flow metrics that are strongly linked to ecological conditions and are amenable to water management. The objective of this step in the ELOHA framework, as depicted in the flow chart, is to create a database, ideally in a GIS, of stream segments that looks something like the figure below. Each segment's "analysis node" is assigned a river type (bold font) and measures of hydrologic alteration (normal font). To assess the degree of flow alteration at each analysis node, baseline hydrology is compared to current hydrology stored in the hydrologic foundation database. This step serves two purposes. First, it standardizes hydrologic impacts, allowing creation of a degree-of-alteration data set to use in combination with ecological data from multiple rivers. This enables data from individual river segments to be combined to define flow-ecology relationships for river types. Second, it helps scientists and stakeholders understand the degree to which streamflow has already been altered throughout the region. Hydrologic characteristics describe the magnitude, timing, frequency, duration, and rate of change of streamflow, ground water, or lake levels. The first step in assessing hydrologic alteration is to select streamflow metrics that describe these characteristics and are ecologically relevant and practical for making water management decisions (Mathews and Richter, 2007). Kennard et al (2009) provide guidance for estimating flow metrics for ecological studies. Weiskel et al (2010) developed indicators to characterize various types of potential alteration, including water withdrawals, treated wastewater discharges, construction of onsite septic systems and dams, forest clearing, and urbanization for subbasins and groundwater contributing areas in Massachusetts. Gao et al (2009) developed a small set of independent and representative hydrologic indicators to best characterize hydrologic alteration caused by reservoirs and other forms of river regulation, and found that "ecodeficit" and "ecosurplus" provide good overall representation of the degree of alteration of a streamflow time series.
| RESOURCES ELOHA flow chart COMPUTER PROGRAMS SELECTING FLOW METRICS CASE STUDIES New Jersey, USA Fraser River basin, Colorado Massachusetts, USA (Weiskel et al 2010) |
Computer Programs Several software packages are capable of computing flow alteration, using daily streamflow data as input. New Jersey, Massachusetts, and Missouri used the Hydrologic Alteration Tool (HAT) software in the U.S. Geological Survey's Hydroecological Integrity Process (HIP) package to calculate flow alteration for analysis nodes with measured streamflow gauging data. The Nature Conservancy's Indicators of Hydrologic Alteration (IHA) software also analyzes flow alteration. In addition to traditional hydrologic metrics, IHA calculates 34 Environmental Flow Components, which were specifically developed to be ecologically relevant; amendable to water resource management; and intuitive to hydrologists, ecologists, and stakeholders alike (Richter et al. 1996; Mathews and Richter 2007). Photo credits (left to right): Photo © Harold E. Malde (vernal pools at Table Mountain); Photo © Cheryl Rose (cormorant in wetlands habitat). | |